Avoid Building AI Before the Data and Use Case Are Mature
At ILOVEGREENER, I explored AI-powered recipe and recommendation capabilities. The mistake was not using AI; the mistake was underestimating how much data quality, user feedback, evaluation criteria, and product clarity are needed before AI becomes genuinely useful.
I learned to avoid treating AI as the starting point. AI should amplify a proven workflow, not compensate for unclear product value. In my current CTO role, I make sure AI work has clear data readiness, review mechanisms, evaluation criteria, and user value before it becomes part of the product roadmap.
AI features were harder to evaluate because success criteria and feedback loops were not mature enough
negativeEngineering effort went into intelligence before the core product behaviour had enough real-world usage data
negativeThe experience made me more realistic about the gap between AI prototypes and dependable production systems
positiveIn later CTO work, I became more careful about responsible AI, human review, data maturity, and measurable outcomes
positive