The Senior Engineers Who Could Not Agree
The Situation
Two respected senior engineers strongly disagree about the direction of an important technical decision. Both arguments are credible, the debate has become personal, and the wider team is waiting for someone to choose a side.
Strong technical teams will disagree. The leadership risk is either allowing debate to continue indefinitely or resolving every disagreement through CTO authority, which can weaken ownership and discourage healthy challenge.
What would you do?